Cases 151 - 160 of 88,357
Schiller v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02097
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Schiller
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sprague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Sprague
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whyte v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Joan Whyte
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Nakisha Allen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ranney v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ranney
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Blake v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02083
Plaintiff:
Alven Blake
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bishop v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bishop
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Roberts v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (JRG2)
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Roberts
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Jones v. Dixie Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02288
Plaintiff:
Justin Lavell Jones
Defendant:
Dixie Transport, Inc. and Ricky Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Breeding v. Air Evac EMS, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Tina Breeding
Defendant:
Air Evac EMS, Inc. doing business as Air Evac Lifeteam and Morgan Wiljanen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
