Cases 151 - 160 of 743
CEVA Ground US, LP et al v. Brown
as 6:2019cv00383
Defendant:
Malinda Brown
Plaintiff:
CEVA Ground US, LP and Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Oaks
as 5:2019cv01071
Defendant:
Melissa Marie Oaks
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AT&T Corp. v. C.D. Brown Construction, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00378
Plaintiff:
AT&T Corp.
Defendant:
C.D. Brown Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Xpress Inc v. Wang et al
as 5:2019cv01042
Defendant:
Glory Christ Cross Transportation LLC and Youzhi Wang
Plaintiff:
US Xpress Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Modoc Nation et al v. Shah et al
as 4:2019cv00588
Plaintiff:
Modoc Nation, Red Cedar Enterprises, Inc., Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Softek Solutions, Inc., Sharad Dadbhawala, Rajesh Shah and others
Defendant:
Rusty Bohl and Blake Follis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King Energy LLC v. Peak Completion Technologies Inc
as 5:2019cv00970
Plaintiff:
King Energy LLC
Defendant:
Peak Completion Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
R4 Investments LLC et al v. Real Protect LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00922
Defendant:
Real Protect LLC, Norton Agency Insurance LLC and Wanda Gail Simmons
Plaintiff:
R4 Investments LLC and Edgemere Homes LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Adams et al
as 5:2019cv00979
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Josephine Jones
Defendant:
Shanda L Adams and Rick Dane Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tulsa Fruit Company v. Almanza et al
as 4:2019cv00458
Plaintiff:
Tulsa Fruit Company
Defendant:
Carlos Almanza, Paisa Produce L.L.C, Mex Flores Produce Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SE Property Holdings LLC v. Welch et al
as 5:2019cv00852
Defendant:
Ruston C Welch and Welch Law Firm PC
Plaintiff:
SE Property Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
