Cases 151 - 160 of 8,749
Ramos-Ramos v. Cohen (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos-Ramos and Pedro J. Ramos-Ramos
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Edward Lavar King
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Sheryl Price, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morrison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Michael LeRoy Thomas
Defendant:
J. Morrison and P. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Kinsey et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Demarquis Brown
Defendant:
Officer Kinsey and Sgt. Marvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. McClain et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Shatarious Ramone Cobb
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Mario Tavarous Young
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keeton et al v. Ogletree et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2023cv00685
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton and Brian Henry Ritter
Defendant:
Sgt. Ogletree, Jay Jones, Officer Snipes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Lewis et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Lt. Lewis and Sgt. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. United States of America (INMATE 3) (MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Kilpatrick Cornelius McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
