Cases 151 - 160 of 112,788
SCOTT v. CENTERION CORPERATION et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
CENTERION CORPERATION, VERDON, ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chase v St. Joe Company et al
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Linda C Chase
Defendant:
Elizabeth J Walters, Carmen Worley and Mary Matos-Weathers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Chase v. Arbor Properties Development Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
Linda C Chase
Defendant:
Arbor Properties Development Inc, Gordon Thames and Jill Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MULLIS v. PRETORIOUS
as 2:2024cv00315
Petitioner:
BRETT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAKLEY v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BLAKLEY
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, K. GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Van Hawk v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Defendant:
Kosciusko County of, Indiana State of, Kosciusko County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Webber
as 1:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Jenica Watkins
Defendant:
Max C. Webber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holbrook v. Galperin et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Erin Holbrook
Defendant:
Mikhail Galperin, Quality Care and Allen County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMPTON v. GALIPEAU
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
DANIEL COMPTON
Respondent:
GALIPEAU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
