Cases 161 - 170 of 156,282
Haddad et al v. Covidien et al
as 1:2024cv11269
Plaintiff:
Shibli Haddad and Glenda Haddad
Defendant:
Covidien and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Wu et al
as 1:2024cv11273
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Michelle Wu, Brittany Vo, London Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Collins et al
as 1:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Nick Collins, Nick Collins' Son, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lane v. Walsh et al
as 1:2024cv11275
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Martin Joseph Walsh, Joan Marie Duffy, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Rouse v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11263
Plaintiff:
Carl Rouse
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Case v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11264
Plaintiff:
Paul Case
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lee v. Bank Of America et al
as 1:2024cv11266
Plaintiff:
Heewon Lee
Defendant:
Bank Of America, Bank Of America, N.A., Home Retention Service/Specialized Loan Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vicente v. Kingkade et al
as 1:2024cv11270
Plaintiff:
Jesuino T Vicente
Defendant:
Kenneth w Kingkade and Edward Varteresian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
