Cases 161 - 170 of 349,439
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01723
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Beiza-Denova v. Hollenhorst
as 0:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Enahi Beiza-Denova
Defendant:
Thomas Hollenhorst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Intact Insurance Group USA LLC et al v. Applied Underwriters, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01721
Defendant:
Applied Underwriters, Inc., Applied Underwriters Services, Inc. and Mark Atkins
Plaintiff:
Intact Insurance Group USA LLC, Intact Services USA LLC and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
SCP Distributors LLC v. Wooden Spoon Pools of Innsbrook, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
SCP Distributors LLC
Defendant:
Wooden Spoon Pools of Innsbrook, LLC and Dustin Loeffler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Perficient, Inc. v. Draeger
as 4:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Perficient, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald Draeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sparks v. Nichols et al
as 4:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Sparks
Defendant:
Kevin Nichols and Nelson Brothers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
