Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 161 - 170 of 85,167
WHITAKER v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv05773
Petitioner: QUADIR WHITAKER
Respondent: WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrone Singleton v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff: TYRONE SINGLETON
Defendant: LAUREL HARRY, SCOTT WHALEN and LISA PETERS
Carter v. Troxler
as 1:2024mc00229
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwayne Hill, Jr. v. Warden SCI Brenner, et al
as 24-1829
Plaintiff: DWAYNE HILL, JR.
Defendant: WARDEN SCI BRENNER, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Alvin Washington v. Bregman, et al
as 24-1823
Plaintiff: ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant: CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN and SGT. F. MCCLELLAN
Stephen White v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1799
Plaintiff: STEPHEN WHITE
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PHILIP JEDRZEJEK, BILL GOODWIN and others
William Webb, Jr. v. Kirk Neal, et al
as 24-1439
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant: KIRK NEAL, Corporal at SCI and C/O EDGAR VERDE
Bicking v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00422
Plaintiff: Guy Bicking
Defendant: Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant: MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALWARD v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv01894
Petitioner: MATTHEW KEITH ALWARD and MATTHEW KEITH BERRY
Respondent: MDOC, WASHTENAW COUNTY and WAYNE COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?