Cases 161 - 170 of 10,603
Sanders v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 2:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Londel Sanders
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cunningham v. FCI Beckley
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Charles Muhammad Cunningham and Charles Muhammad Abdus-Shaheed Cunningham
Defendant:
FCI Beckley, Kitchen Manager Bailey, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mackey
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Director of Security Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Tykweyzha L. Sanders
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Witt v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heather Witt
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dobbs v. Lovette
as 5:2024cv00029
Petitioner:
Kasper Lamar Dobbs
Respondent:
Warden Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wells v. Ray
as 3:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Andrivia Frances Wells
Respondent:
Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kidd v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kidd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Lye, Sandra May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ravenscroft, Jr. v. Morrisey et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick Morrisey, Office of the Attorney General, Perry J. DeChristopher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ellinger v. North Central Regional Jail
as 5:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Emanuel Ellinger
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
