Cases 161 - 170 of 22,852
Frost v. Davenport et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Jared Dakota Frost
Defendant:
Jennifer Davenport, Byron Oliver, Alan Smitherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pleasant v. Yescare (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ray Dean Pleasant
Defendant:
Yescare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
William N. Lucy
Defendant:
Securus Technologies, K. Albritton, Chairman of Board of Directors of Securus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Jefferson County Courthouse et al
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Jefferson County Courthouse, Jefferson County Jail, Judge Shelly Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maritza v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Claudia Lorza Maritza
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. Osborn
as 7:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Bobby Presley
Defendant:
Stefan Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
