Cases 171 - 180 of 5,646
Smith v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00885
Petitioner:
Roy Dean Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. Virtue Recovery Center et al
as 6:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
Virtue Recovery Center, Ms. FNU Jaquez, Dr. Rajesh Harripersad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Terri Hopkins, Tonia Hopkins, Chris Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Bryan Rietsma, Christopher Wiedau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. McDonough
as 5:2023cv01552
Defendant:
Michael Aretth Smith and Denis Richard McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. ESO Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01557
Plaintiff:
Essie Jones, Essie McVay, Larry Claybo and others
Defendant:
ESO Solutions, Inc., Robert Day, George Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Anderson v. L. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04726
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson
Defendant:
L. Smith, Harris County Sherriff's Department, Harris County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2023cv04723
Plaintiff:
Sandrakay Smith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01114
Petitioner:
Aaron Wade Smith
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
