Cases 171 - 180 of 65,688
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Dawn Crosby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ketcher v. White et al
as 5:2024cv05090
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Ketcher
Defendant:
Deputy White and Deputy Venasula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massimo et al v. Onyx Brands, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv05091
Defendant:
Onyx Brands, Inc., Onyx Brands, LLC, Onyx Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Reid Massimo and Sarah Reid Massimo Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Wiley v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Brian Wiley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Dollar v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Dollar
Defendant:
Derek Adams, Chasta Harrison and Van Buren County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ford v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Justin D Ford
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
