Cases 11 - 20 of 244,556
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Roger John Donald Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King et al v. Monsanto Company
as 6:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Roy King and Linda King
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Masters v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Masters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ortiz v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Antonia Ortiz
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Continental Resources Inc v. Mountain States Pressure Services Inc
as 5:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Continental Resources Inc
Defendant:
Mountain States Pressure Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Garneau v. Children's Hospital et al
as 5:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Rodney R Garneau
Defendant:
Children's Hospital, Myka Oberlechner, Oklahoma County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00464
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norwood v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Samuel Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
