Cases 11 - 20 of 24,598
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff:
MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
TARAY HERRING
Defendant:
EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Rivera
Defendant:
Robert May, Tasha Hollingsworth, Lt. Daum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Superior Court of the State of Delaware et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Chad Eric Hopper
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of Delaware and Andrea Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
as 2:2024cv01846
Plaintiff:
JAMES NORMAN ZIEGENFUSS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING V. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
PA GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tejada v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Jones v. NJ Doc Central Transportation, et al
as 24-1758
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
NJ DOC CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION, DR. IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, M.D., DR. JAMES K. LIU, Rutgers Neurosurgeon and others
Charles Jones v. Jerry Hobeck, et al
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DARNELL JONES
Defendant:
JERRY HOBECK, Police Officer, JUDITH P. PETRUSH, District Attorney and FRANK PALLONE, JR., Magisterial District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
