Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 0:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Hensley et al
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Marcus F. Chapman
Defendant:
Garret Hensley, Arthur Fannin, Robert Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinegar v. London, Kentucky et al
as 6:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Cody M. Brinegar
Defendant:
London, Kentucky, Laurel County, Kentucky, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Maglinger et al
as 4:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
James Lee Mays
Defendant:
Arthur Maglinger, Sgt Ripley and Chris Isbill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Arthur N. Pruitt, Sr.
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monhollen v. General Motors, LLC
as 6:2021cv00192
Plaintiff:
Arthur Monhollen
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
York v. Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Sarah York
Defendant:
Saint Elizabeth Medical Center, Inc., Garren Colvin, Gary Blank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
