Cases 11 - 20 of 231
Arthur et al v. City of Jackson et al
as 3:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Garry Arthur, Keith Freeman and Robert Watts
Defendant:
City of Jackson, Jackson Police Department and Chief James Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. USA
as 5:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Arthur Wilson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burdette v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette and Scooter
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mr. McDonald, Ms. Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdette v. Mississippi Parole Board
as 4:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arthur Burdette
Defendant:
Mississippi Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Patrick
as 3:2023ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Megan Mariah Patrick
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Brooks
as 3:2023ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Brandon LaRue Brooks
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Hammett
as 3:2023ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Mary Holly Hammett
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Smith v. Orzechowski
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Arthur Smith
Defendant:
David Orzechowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2022ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Latisha R. Smith
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
