Cases 11 - 20 of 288
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 3:2023cv00675
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Jones
Defendant:
Warden Gilley, J. Hutson, Larry Monhollen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. Bailey et al
as 3:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Kevin O. Thomas
Defendant:
Brandon Bailey and A1 Porta Potty LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hoskins v. Dutcher et al
as 6:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kennie Hoskins
Defendant:
Robert Dutcher, Matthew Halcomb, Erica Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Brandon Harris
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Gomez et al
as 6:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Brooks v. Next Level Relief, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dwan Brooks, Mark Anthony Carter, Dioveon Allen and others
Defendant:
Next Level Relief, LLC, Brandon Cain and Justin Bowie
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 5:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Henderson (Lt)
as 0:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lamont Bailey
Defendant:
Dustin Henderson (Lt)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
