Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Alvarado-Melendez v. USA
as 3:2020cv02057
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Alvarado-Melendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ALVARADO v. QUAKERTOWN AUTO CAR WASH, INC.
as 2:2020cv03658
Defendant:
QUAKERTOWN AUTO CAR WASH, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALVARADO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALVARADO v. QUAKERTOWN AUTO CAR WASH, INC.
as 5:2020cv03658
Defendant:
QUAKERTOWN AUTO CAR WASH, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ALVARADO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00604
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarado v. The Philadelphia Inquirer, LLC
as 2:2020cv01854
Defendant:
The Philadelphia Inquirer, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jose Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alvarado Castillo et al v. Shippensburg Urban Developers, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02236
Plaintiff:
Maria Maribel Alvarado and Jose Francisco Alvarado Castillo
Defendant:
United States of America, by Internal Revenue Service and Shippensburg Urban Developers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Beam et al
as 1:2018cv02108
Defendant:
Zak Huth, John R. Holty, Mike Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Henderson et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2018cv01371
Defendant:
Public Defender Catherine Himes, Judge Michael Flannelly, Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson, Franklin Jackson, Rashi Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarado v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company
as 3:2018cv01166
Plaintiff:
Lisa Alvarado
Defendant:
New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
