Cases 11 - 20 of 275
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Biecker et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chris Biecker, FNU Miller, R. Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobus et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Jason Tyler Jacobus, Honeybird Organic Farm, LLC, Dennis Leveris and others
Defendant:
Debra Lahnum, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Jenkins v. NC Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Tyima Jenkins
Defendant:
NC Department Transportation, Commissioner Wayne Goodwin, NC Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jenkins v. USA
as 3:2023cv00402
Petitioner:
Corey Donnell Jenkins
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Freeman et al
as 5:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Freeman, FNU Honeycutt, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brice C. Moore
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt and FNU Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Bruce Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
