Cases 11 - 20 of 181
United States of America v. Dollison
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dwayne Dollison, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
James v. Official's Bethel Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Paul R. James, Jr.
Defendant:
Official's Bethel Jail, DOC, Andrew Carl and others
Crowley v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Crowley, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom and Cherlye Gibb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orlino v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Daniel Orlino, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Melvin Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acker et al v. Providence Health & Services Washington et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Justin Acker, Emily Acker, E.A. and others
Defendant:
Providence Health & Services Washington doing business as Providence Alaska Medical Center, Barbara Knox and Bryant Skinner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Federal Bureau of Investigations et al
as 1:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, John E Kuhn, Jr, Michael Jahnsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clarke v. Newsom et al
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Eleni Kounalakis, Rob Bonta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clarke v. Kavanaugh et al
as 1:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Brett Kavanaugh, Samuel A Alito, Jr., Amy Coney Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clarke v. Romney et al
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Mitt Romney, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
