Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Johnson #252308 v. Newcomb et al
as 2:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Unknown Young, Unknown Biggers, W. Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleotis L. Johnson #252308
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv10953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Pruitt v. Social Security, Commissioner
as 2:2017cv13053
Plaintiff:
Raeshele Pruitt
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MASTERS et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12289
Plaintiff:
ALYSHA MASTERS , CANDIS DIXON , STEPHANIE DUNCAN and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fenner et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2017cv11661
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, General Motors LLC and Robert Bosch LLC
Plaintiff:
Andrei Fenner, Joshua Herman, Anthony Gadecki and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Carrie Mizell, Matt Henderson, George Stanley and others
Petitioner:
Trifecta Performance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McClendon, Inidividually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dorothea Pruitt, Deceased v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB
as 2:2016cv10442
Plaintiff:
Henry McClendon, Inidividually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Dorothea Pruitt, Deceased
Defendant:
Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Morgan et al
as 2:2015cv10994
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
S. Morgan, T. Winn, T. Haines and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv10508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pruitt v. AFSCME Council 25 et al
as 2:2014cv12696
Plaintiff:
Paula A Pruitt
Defendant:
AFSCME Council 25, AFSCME Local 2650, Al Garrett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
