Cases 11 - 20 of 272
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Martha Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Davison v. City of Lorain et al.
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Davison
Defendant:
City of Lorain, Cielo Rodriguez, Mallory Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Robert Rodriguez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Amardeep Trucking, Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Isaac Rodriguez
Defendant:
Amardeep Trucking, Inc. and Jagroop S. Hayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rodriguez v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03925
Plaintiff:
Abel Rodriguez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03923
Plaintiff:
Estella Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cross-Blancke v. Flaiz et al
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cross-Blancke
Defendant:
James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray and Oscar E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terwilliger et al v. Intellihartx, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Terwilliger and Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Intellihartx, LLC and Fortra LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Boykin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon and Elizabeth Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Elsa Maria Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
