Cases 11 - 20 of 509
Burd v. Zaken et al
as 3:2023cv00312
Petitioner:
Drue Scott Burd
Respondent:
Superintendent Zaken, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BLAIR v. ABBVIE INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01871
Plaintiff:
ROLF BLAIR
Defendant:
ABBVIE INC., ALLERGAN INC., ALLERGAN USA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
DANIELS et al v. BLAIR et al
as 2:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
KELVIN DANIELS and DANEE SLATON
Defendant:
EARNEST BLAIR, D. REEDER, LT. RADTKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Torres-Santiago v. J.C. Blair Clinic et al
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Arnaldo Torres-Santiago
Defendant:
J.C. Blair Clinic, Kevin Kauffman, J. Rivello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
