Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Goins v. Keener
as 3:2022cv00263
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Goins
Respondent:
Captain Keener and Sledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goins v. Carroll et al
as 3:2022cv00262
Plaintiff:
Joseph Goins
Defendant:
Officer Carroll, Unknown Sargeant, Loudon County Sheriff's Department Booking Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Newsom v. Golden et al
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Robert Starbuck Newsom and Robby Starbuck
Defendant:
Scott Golden, Tennessee Republican Party, The, Mark Goins and others
Amicus Curiae:
Morgan Ortagus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alexandria-Williams v. Goins et al
as 2:2022cv02134
Petitioner:
M. Latroy Alexandria-Williams
Respondent:
Mark Goins, Mary Mancini, Linda Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Goins et al
as 2:2022cv02107
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Gloria Jenkins
Defendant:
Garrett A. Goins and Southern Pipe & Supply Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Swann v. Hinkle et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Swann, Jr. and James Swann, Jr
Defendant:
Amy L. Hinkle, Jerry Beck, Emily Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Goins et al
as 3:2021cv00388
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Hudson
Defendant:
Robbie K. Goins, Stoney Love and Campbell County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thacker v. Goins et al
as 3:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wayne Thacker
Defendant:
Robbie Goins, Stony Love and Campbell County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strand v. Harville et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Robert Samuel Strand
Defendant:
James Harville, Chris Harville, C. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Love et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Toby R Lane
Defendant:
Stoney Love, Sgt. Katie Wilson, Lt. Mallory Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
