Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Saninocencio v. Welch et al
as 1:2021cv11455
Plaintiff:
Nellie Saninocencio
Defendant:
Richard E. Welch, III, Pierce and Mandell, PC, Litchfield Cavo. LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alves et al v. McNamara et al
as 1:2020cv11933
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alves, Nathan Pierce and Nicholas Bernat
Defendant:
Branville Bard, Donna McNamara and Richard Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jackson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp
as 1:2020cv11756
Plaintiff:
Pierce Jackson and Sylvia Jackson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy et al v. Weatherproofing Technologies, Inc
as 1:2019cv12487
Plaintiff:
Mark Kennedy, Joseph Wright, Richard Pierce, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Weatherproofing Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cellco Partnership v. City of Boston, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2019cv11936
Defendant:
Paul J. Donnelly, Danielle Santos, Beacon Hill Architectural Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Cellco Partnership
Pierce, et al. v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2019cv11375
Plaintiff:
Martha Pierce and Andrew Pierce
Defendant:
HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Berkowitz v. Town of Rowley Planning Board et al
as 1:2019cv10385
Defendant:
David F Jacquith, Town of Rowley Planning Board, Troy Spaulding and others
Plaintiff:
Bonni Berkowitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monteiro v. City Of Brockton et al
as 1:2019cv10576
Defendant:
Matthew Murphy, David Luu, Jason Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Monteiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PIERCE v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 1:2018cv11689
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Plaintiff:
MARY ETTA PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
