Cases 11 - 20 of 692
Attaway v. Nottingham et al
as 3:2024cv01561
Defendant:
Amanda Smith, Calvin Pend, Lt Penn and others
Plaintiff:
Micheal N.B. Attaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Mock et al
as 1:2024cv04829
Defendant:
Sullivan, John Doe and Howard Mock
Plaintiff:
Cuddellous Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Ewing v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Defendant:
Keith Ehrke, Brian Richard Erwin, Uriel Ortega and others
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mundy v. Village of Summit et al
as 1:2024cv04277
Defendant:
Mayra Ortiz, Arthur Sullivan, Sergio Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
William Mundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vlietstra v. Starkey et al
as 1:2024cv03379
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Vlietstra
Defendant:
Eric M Starkey, Andrew Watts, Derek Diehl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 3:2024cv50139
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 4:2024cv04064
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
