Cases 11 - 20 of 105
Clervrain et al v. Krebs et al
as 4:2022cv04047
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Niva Guerrier
Defendant:
Shantel Krebs, Kristi Noem, Jason Ravnsborg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Cody v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Doug Clark, Daniel Sullivan, Jennifer Dreiske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton-Morales v. Walburg
as 4:2021cv04206
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hinton-Morales
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Walburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Fluke et al
as 4:2021cv04167
Defendant:
Chuck Gilchrist, Brent Fluke, Rebecca Schieffer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton-Morales v. Lake County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2021cv04142
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hinton-Morales
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff Office and Tim Walburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Croymans et al
as 1:2021cv01007
Defendant:
Robert W. Dooley, Tim Zempel, City of Sisseton and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gomez v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2020cv04151
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, Minnehaha County States Attorneys Office, Tim Herschberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond v. Butler et al
as 4:2020cv04054
Defendant:
Milo Hartson, Travis Olsen, Brittany Stenzel and others
Plaintiff:
Prentice W. Almond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rounds v. The Hartford et al
as 4:2020cv04010
Plaintiff:
Tim Rounds
Defendant:
Hartford Financial Services, Inc., The Hartford and Hartford Casualty Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rounds v. The Hartford et al
as 5:2020cv05002
Plaintiff:
Tim Rounds
Defendant:
Hartford Financial Services, Inc., The Hartford and Hartford Casualty Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
