Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Cerrato-Gonzalez v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00137
Defendant:
John 1-10 Does, William P. Barr and Chad Wolf
Plaintiff:
Osman Donald Cerrato-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Zurvita, Inc. v. Does
as 4:2019cv00674
Defendant:
John 1-10 Does
Plaintiff:
Zurvita, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Tanner v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv03023
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kozette Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mary Kay Inc v. Anderson, et al
as 3:2017cv01889
Defendant:
Elizabeth Anderson and John 1-10 Does
Plaintiff:
Mary Kay Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Clendennen v. City of Waco, et al
as 6:2015cv00173
Defendant:
Manuel Chavez, City of Waco, County of McLennan, Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alan Clendennen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childress v. Watkins et al
as 5:2014cv00748
Plaintiff:
Jason Truman Childress
Defendant:
City of Dallas, County of Dallas, Dallas Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thatch et al v. Johnson & Johnson Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01273
Plaintiff:
Helen Thatch and Brian Thatch
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boothe v. Campbell et al
as 6:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Boothe
Defendant:
James Campbell, Michael Lindsey, Robin Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Indigital Solutions, LLC et al v. MOHAMMED et al
as 4:2012cv02428
Plaintiff:
Indigital Solutions, LLC and Goran Zinic
Defendant:
AHMAD RASHID MOHAMMED and John 1-10 Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
