Cases 11 - 20 of 1,115
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Su v. Red Oak Tree Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv50116
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Red Oak Tree Service, Inc. and Humberto Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Barnes v. Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02214
Plaintiff:
Robbie Barnes
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart, Superintendent Boutte and Director Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Tommie Austin, Paulsen Bronston, Patricia Brooks and others
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk, Inc., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LP., NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Roxanne K Miller
Defendant:
Ivan Gonzalez, Ioan Nemes, Eric Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Demetrio B Campbell
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Jhon Doe, Szulir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Dominick Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe, The City of Chicago and Francisco Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
