Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MEYER v. COTTON et al
as 1:2020cv02120
Defendant:
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP and RAYMOND D. COTTON
Plaintiff:
DR. TIMOTHY MEYER and TIMOTHY MEYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00624
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Plaintiff:
LAFARGE NORTH AMERICA, INC., LAFARGE PNW, INC., MEYER MATERIAL COMPANY, LLC and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY et al v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE et al
as 1:2019cv03629
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF WEST MARIN, MARIN CONSERVATION LEAGUE, SAVE OUR SEASHORE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, Paul Daniel Smith, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MEYER GROUP, LTD v. RAYBORN et al
as 1:2019cv01945
Defendant:
BROAD STREET REALTY, LLC and JAMES M. RAYBORN
Plaintiff:
THE MEYER GROUP, LTD and MEYER GROUP, LTD.
HARRIS et al v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2019cv00886
Defendant:
MURIEL ELIZABETH BOWSER, KFIR GAMLIEL, DOUGLAS SCOTT MEYER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HARRIS and DAVID HARRIS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRIFFIN et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2019cv00762
Defendant:
JOHN KOSKINEN, K. COLT, JAMES P. CALIGURE and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL ADEYEMI OMOTOSHO, MICHAEL T. CHOCK, JULIO RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOZGOZ et al v. JAMES et al
as 1:2019cv00239
Defendant:
CHRIS WUNSCH, ROBERT WILKIE, WILLIE CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET BOZGOZ and AUSTIN BOZGOZ
Petitioner:
ROBERT BOZGOZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
