Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Parker v. Warden
as 6:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
Michael Jerome Parker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Myers et al v. Parker, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ben Myers and Alisa Lask
Defendant:
Parker, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Parker v. Dixon-Bullock
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Montrell Parker
Defendant:
Judge Linda Dixon-Bullock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shannon v. Thacker et al
as 5:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Desirae Thacker, Parker CrayCraft, Helby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 0:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ruffin Parker
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. Parker
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Branden M. Scott
Defendant:
Ashley Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones et al v. Georgetown College et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
William A. Jones, Amy R. Jones, Annalise Jones and others
Defendant:
Georgetown College, Board of Trustees of Georgetown College, Rosemary A. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Eurton et al v. Thomas et al
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Eurton, Jr. and Lauren E. Whisman
Defendant:
Parker Thomas, Tyler Covington and Oldham County Fiscal Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ruffin Parker
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazelwood v. Keene et al
as 5:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
James R. Hazelwood
Defendant:
H. Keene, Lebanon Police Department, Deputy Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
