Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Guillen v. Horry County Council et al
as 4:2017cv00400
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Guillen
Defendant:
Horry County Council , Harold Worley , Mark Lazarus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regan et al v. Charleston SC, City of
as 2:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
James Regan , Jesse Faircloth , Michael Pack and others
Defendant:
Charleston SC, City of
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Harrold v. Progressive Insurance Company
as 4:2013cv02501
Plaintiff:
Alfonso L Harrold
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Staton v. McCall
as 5:2012cv02483
Petitioner:
Alfonso Staton
Respondent:
Michael McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haynesworth v. Cothran et al
as 2:2012cv02466
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
R Ferrell Cothran, Jr, Lloyd W Flores, Jr, Kimberly S Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Boyd v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2010cv00237
Plaintiff:
Alfonso S Boyd
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hartwell v. Ozmit
as 0:2009cv03065
Petitioner:
Alfonso Hartwell
Respondent:
John Ozmit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barfield et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00095
Plaintiff:
Susie A Barfield, Tommy G Barton, Sr, Charles R Beard and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Jimmy Thornton and Mike Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Ware v. South Carolina, State of
as 9:2007cv03799
Petitioner:
Alfonso Ware, Jr
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
