Cases filed in Rhode Island
Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00373
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Bailey Associates Counseling & Training Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00640
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Bailey Associates Counseling & Training Center, Inc. and Lynn M. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tucker v. Bailey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00062
Defendant: Nancy Bailey, William Divine, Robert McClutcheon and others
Plaintiff: Deaven E. Tucker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores et al v. Chafee et al
as 1:2011cv00249
Plaintiff: Joseph Flores, Adrian Bustamantes, Gregory Garrappa and others
Defendant: Chafee, A. T. Wall, Nancy Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Wall, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00069
Plaintiff: Joseph Flores
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Nancy Bailey, James Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Melchiori
as 1:2011cv00010
Plaintiff: Robert Bailey
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03484
Plaintiff: Amanda Lynn Bailey
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Seamans v. Wall et al
as 1:2010cv00406
Plaintiff: Gabriel Seamans
Defendant: A.T. Wall, Nancy Bailey, Warden Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Wall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00241
Plaintiff: Daniel R. Morgan
Defendant: Ashbel T. Wall, Nancy Bailey, Joseph Dinitto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?