Cases 11 - 20 of 443
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 6:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. USA
as 5:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
Clint Dion Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wynn v. Kentucky State Police et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jay Wynn
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police and Brent Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Todd et al
as 4:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
David Jason Taylor
Defendant:
Bruce Todd, Colonel Leslie Gibson, Felicia Rowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Capt Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Scott County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00201
Defendant:
Latosha Jordan Tucker, Scott County Detention Center, Jailer Derran Broyles and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Conrad Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, KY et al
as 3:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tamara Ernster
Defendant:
City of Mt. Washington, KY, Bradley Aubin, Mark Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Sean Davis
Defendant:
City of Covington, Michael Lusardi and 1-10 Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
