Cases 11 - 20 of 310
Davis v. City of South Milwaukee et al
as 2:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Ontario Davis
Defendant:
City of South Milwaukee and Steve D Streicher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund et al v. RL Davis Contracting Services LLC
as 2:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Building Trades United Pension Trust Fund and Doug Edwards
Defendant:
RL Davis Contracting Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Davis-Rogers v. Wussow et al
as 2:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Akiel Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
Joel Wussow, Randall Hepp and Yana Pusich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, Katherine v. Epic Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Katherine Davis
Defendant:
Epic Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Davis-Rogers v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Akiel Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
John Doe and Jamall Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheek v. Preskop et al
as 1:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Cheek
Defendant:
Anthony S Preskop, Wyatt Reinke, Eric R Heywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krizan, Justin v. Davis, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Krizan
Defendant:
Kevin Davis, Donna Pittman and Christopher Drost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Chisholm et al
as 2:2023cv00494
Petitioner:
Glenn M Davis
Respondent:
John Chisholm, James J Martin, Laura Arbuckle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Tegels
as 2:2023cv00336
Petitioner:
Bruce Terrell Davis
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
