Cases 11 - 20 of 1,295
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
John E Heavener and John E. Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John E Heavener
Defendant:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Derrek E Arrington
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and DESIGNATION, SENTENCE, & COMPUTATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Butler v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Kyle E. Waters, Matthew Orendorff and Stacey Slaughter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caloto v. Paycom Software, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Chris H. Caloto
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig E. Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Minarik et al v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joseph Minarik
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Terrapin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Terrapin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schoenrock v. Paycom Software Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Corey Schoenrock
Defendant:
Paycom Software Inc, Chad Richison and Craig Boelte
Petitioner:
Calvin E Mein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
