Cases 11 - 20 of 33,641
Black et al v. Lafarge S.A. et al
as 1:2024cv08901
Plaintiff:
Myeshia Johnson, Shere Greenfield, Paul Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Lafarge S.A., Lafarge Cement Holding Limited and LaFarge Cement Syria S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Lopez Castro)
as 24-3351
Defendant:
Sealed Defendant 1, Sealed Defendant 1, Cache and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pablo Zarate-Gonzalez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-3338
Petitioner:
PABLO ZARATE-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Mario Tucker v. Michelle Gonzalez, et al
as 24-3339
Defendant:
AARON BAMKE, JOSELUIS RAMIREZ, ZACHARY SANGRAW and others
Plaintiff:
MARIO T. TUCKER
Steele et al v. Drebco Directional, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Humberto Rodriguez, Tommy Steele, Manuel Ponce and others
Defendant:
Drebco Directional, LLC, Kara Gearner and Dreben Gearner, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Cruz v. G & T Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01584
Defendant:
G & T Construction, Inc. and Sergio Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Juan Cruz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Limon-Gonzalez v. Sand Cloud Holdings, LLC
as 4:2024cv10107
Plaintiff:
Saul Limon-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sand Cloud Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mateo Mateo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-7789
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
ROSA MARIA MATEO MATEO, LAURA FLORES FRANCISCO MATEO and MATEO GONZALEZ FRANCISCO MATEO
United States of America v. Gonzalez-Lopez
as 24-7809
Defendant:
CARLOS ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ-LOPEZ
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boyd v. Doe #1
as 24-3338
Defendant:
Correction Officer JOHN DOE #5, Clinton Correctional Facility, Corrections Officer MAHAN, Correction Officer YOUNG, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
NYJEE L. BOYD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
