Cases 11 - 20 of 6,250
Colbaugh v. Meigs County et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Andrew Colbaugh
Defendant:
Meigs County, Meigs County Sheriff's Department, Robert Leonard and others
Intervenor:
Nathan Alexander Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Doe (HWB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
John Doe (HWB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pack v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Marty B Pack
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, CJ Ball, Joshua R Hartsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Doe (JDC) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
John Doe (JDC)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Leah Joy Ward
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemaker v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michelle Shoemaker
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips, Tennessee Department of Correction and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli
Defendant:
Joseph A. Woodruff, Estate of Kimberly Helper, John Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
