Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Longs v. Wherry et al
as 4:2018cv03153
Defendant:
Amy Goodro, Lincoln Police Department and Steven D. Wherry
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Johnson
as 4:2018cv03148
Defendant:
Bradley Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Hawk
as 4:2018cv03146
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Longs, II
Defendant:
Troy L. Hawk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Longs v. Jacobsens et al
as 4:2018cv03120
Respondent:
Kristin, Hon. Jacobsens, Hon. McManaman and others
Petitioner:
Michael Longs, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross et al v. Buckles et al
as 8:2017mc00089
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Ross et al v. Buckles et al
as 8:2017mc00062
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ross v. Skyline Manor, Inc. et al
as 8:2017mc00038
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Long v. USA et al
as 8:2016cv00169
Petitioner:
Roland K. Long
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ross et al v. Skyline Manor, Inc. et al
as 8:2015mc00126
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, Dan Elliott and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
