Cases 11 - 20 of 1,174
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01284
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miles v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01287
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Stateville NRC
as 3:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willis Mitchell
Defendant:
Stateville NRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Latoya Hughes and Richard Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANR Pipeline Company v. 3.51 Acres et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
ANR Pipeline Company
Defendant:
3.51 Acres, More or Less, In McHenry County, Illinois and The Lorraine J. Weisz Trust Under That Certain Trust Agreement dated June 26, 2004, Mitchell R. Weisz, As Successor Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Mathews v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03309
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Mathews
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc., Soft Sheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Tuggle v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tuggle
Defendant:
Cord Williams, Christian L. Pyles, E Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
