Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01249
Plaintiff:
Debbie S. Morgan
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Companies, Inc., Correct Care Solutions, LLC, CHC Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Navistar Maxxforce Engines Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2014cv10318
In_re:
Navistar Maxxforce Engines Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
PAR 4 Transport, LLC , Southern California Moving, Inc., B&T Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
B&T Express, Inc. et al v. Navistar International Corporation
as ILN/1:14-cv-05841
Plaintiff:
B&T Express, Inc. , OMCO Enterprises, LLC , ALJEN Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant:
Navistar International Corporation
PAR 4 Transport, LLC vs Navistar
as ILN/1:14-cv-05151
Plaintiff:
PAR 4 TRANSPORT, LLC , Denis Gray Trucking, Inc., Carmichael Leasing Co., Inc. d/b/a Carmichael Nationalease and others
Defendant:
Navistar Inc.
B&T Express, Inc. et al v. Navistar International Corporation
as 1:2014cv05841
Plaintiff:
B&T Express, Inc. , OMCO Enterprises, LLC , ALJEN Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant:
Navistar International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAR 4 Transport, LLC vs Navistar
as 1:2014cv05151
Plaintiff:
PAR 4 TRANSPORT, LLC , Denis Gray Trucking, Inc., Carmichael Leasing Co., Inc. d/b/a Carmichael Nationalease and others
Defendant:
Navistar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCabe v. Mahoning County Children Services
as 4:2009cv01931
Plaintiff:
Ryan McCabe and Trisha McCabe
Defendant:
Mahoning County Children Services Board, Jane Doe, Brad Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
