Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Knight et al v. United States et al
as 8:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight, Alphonso V. Frazier, II and Phyllis M. Knight Bey D.M.
Defendant:
United States and Robert F. Rossiter, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frazier et al v. Meyers et al
as 8:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II and Phyllis M. Knight
Respondent:
Michael Meyers and Nebraska Unicameral Legislature
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frazier v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II
Defendant:
City of Omaha, John Henige, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MMIC Insurance, Inc. v. Andrews, M.D. et al
as 8:2021cv00215
Defendant:
Nancy Kaspari, Richard V. Andrews, M.D. and RA Neurological, L.T.D., P.C.
Plaintiff:
MMIC Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
