Cases 11 - 20 of 14,970
Jones v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Dee Williams
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv01464
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, ZIGLER, BREHM and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. GREENWOOD MOTOR LINES, INC. et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EVANS
Defendant:
CLAUDE BROOKS, R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, L.L.C. and GREENWOOD MOTOR LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
GRIMES v. HUNT et al
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. GRIMES
Defendant:
HUGH HUNT, CLARK COLTOM, ANN MISCHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
John Williams and Elizabeth Williams
Defendant:
Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holly v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00698
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
William Holly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07111
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN CHARLES SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Aker et al v. Fort Wayne, Indiana City of
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Kamron Bell, Jason Bales, Scott Alday and others
Defendant:
City of Fort Wayne, Indiana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
