Cases 11 - 20 of 25
LEE v. YSKANICH et al
as 3:2014cv00244
Plaintiff:
BREON LAMAR LEE
Defendant:
BOB YSKANICH, KERRA MUDI, ED CWIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. SECRETARY JEFFREY BEARD et al
as 3:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SECRETARY JEFFREY A. BEARD, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON v. BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY et al
as 3:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant:
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS INDUSTRY, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION, VIEWSONIC CORPORATION'S CFO SUNG YI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. COUTTS et al
as 3:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
R. COUTTS, J. J. SOSSON, T. FULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSSINGER v. BEGGS et al
as 1:2011cv00259
Plaintiff:
GEORGE S. BUSSINGER
Defendant:
BRIAN BEGGS, GAIL L. BRANDONIO, SHARON DOMBROWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
ROBERT THOMAS
Defendant:
GERALD ROZUM, SYLVIA GIBSON, ALLEN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLOAN v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
GERALD L. ROZUM, HEIDI SROKA, DAWN DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESLEY v. BEARD et al
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, DORINA VARNER, NICHOLAS SCHARFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2009cv00262
Plaintiff:
SHAUN WRIGHT
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONNA VARNER, TRACY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. MCVEY et al
as 2:2009cv01258
Petitioner:
AARON T. JONES
Respondent:
CATHERINE MCVEY, GERALD ROZUM, ALLEN JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
