Cases 11 - 20 of 7,082
Anderson v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2024cv03876
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Plaintiff:
James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ANDERSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03872
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE ANN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SIMMONS v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00218
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT L. OLIVER, C.O.F. RODRIGUEZ, C.O.P. BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HIMES v. FIVE BELOW, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv03638
Defendant:
JOEL ANDERSON and FIVE BELOW, INC.
Plaintiff:
TYLER HIMES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
ANDERSON et al v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2024cv02181
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SHABAZZ v. BRUCE et al
as 2:2024cv01854
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
CHRIS BRUCE, CERRON CADE, JEFF FLYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ANDERSON et al v. THE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
as 2:2024cv02586
Defendant:
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS
Plaintiff:
IAN CALLAGHAN-KENNA and KATHERINE ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ANDERSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
KHALID ANDERSON
Defendant:
TERRA, JENKINS and K OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ANDERSON v. BARITZ et al
as 2:2024cv02095
Defendant:
KENNETH L. BARITZ, BARITZ LAW ASSOCIATES LLC and PMC PROPERTY GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
EVA ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
