Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Garcia v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Guadalupe County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID et al
as 5:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Mailroom Dept. of TDCJ-ID, Directors Review Committee and M.S.C.P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Disciplinary Department
as 6:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Disciplinary Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. Aldana et al
as 5:2023cv01521
Plaintiff:
Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Officer FNU Aldana and SAPD Femail Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Hays County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Andres Garcia
Defendant:
Hays County Sheriff's Office, Robert Blanchard, Bryan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv02469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Garcia
as 4:2019cv01530
Defendant:
Andres Garcia d/b/a All Care EMS
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Andres Garcia v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 4:2018cv04042
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Andres Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Garcia d/b/a All Care EMS
as 4:2017cv01202
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andres Garcia d/b/a All Care EMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
