Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
SMITH v. ROZUM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00537
Petitioner: ANTHONY SMITH
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv07826
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
TINNEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv03698
Plaintiff: MARIE TINNEY and ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNIDENTIFIED DRUG ENFORCEMENT UNDERCOVER AGENT, ALIAS, BRUCE M. FAIRCHILD/BRUCE MUHLBERGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
SMITH v. ROZUM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00825
Petitioner: ANTHONY SMITH
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv02422
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, TYREEK CUNNINGHAM, FLOYD JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRANCH v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE et al
as 2:2008mc00009
Plaintiff: MARC A. BRANCH
Defendant: NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE, BRICKHOUSE, TERRY LUNN and others
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
SMITH v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2008cv00098
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant: ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
SMITH v. MCVERRY
as 2:2007cv01440
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant: TERRENCE F. MCVERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. HARDIMAN
as 2:2007cv01441
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant: THOMAS HARDIMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. TODD et al
as 2:2007cv01397
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant: JUDGE JOY FLOWERS CONTI, ROBERT C. MITCHELL, RANDAL B. TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?