Cases 11 - 20 of 21
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv01739
Plaintiff:
Kristin Andrade
Defendant:
Anton and Stavig Living Trust, Estate of Maren Stavig and Barry Anton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrade v. Anton et al
as 3:2018cv05997
Plaintiff:
Kristin Andrade
Defendant:
Anton and Stavig Living Trust, Estate of Maren Stavig and Barry Anton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv05520
Plaintiff:
Antone Daniels
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2017cv05794
Plaintiff:
Abel Robinson
Defendant:
Jackson, Guiler, Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez Anton v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01131
Plaintiff:
Felix Pedro Gutierrez Anton
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lindbeck v. Glebe
as 3:2012cv06014
Petitioner:
Anton A H Lindbeck
Respondent:
Patrick Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antone-Sem v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services
as 2:2011cv00906
Plaintiff:
Cory Antone-Sem , E.S. and G.S.
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services for the State of Washington , Susan Dreyfus , Nancy Timms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company v. Baydak et al
as 2:2011cv00567
Plaintiff:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Yelena Baydak and Anton Baydak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chaney v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2010cv00830
Plaintiff:
Carl S. Chaney
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire, Eldon Vail, Bruce Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olson v. Ocean Shipholdings Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00876
Plaintiff:
Earl Anton Olson
Defendant:
Ocean Shipholdings Inc, Ocean Ships Inc, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
