Cases 11 - 20 of 581
Haney v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Haney, II
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction, Jacob Winebarger, Burton M. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Adams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bulluck v. USA
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Christopher Bulluck
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rollins v. State of North Carolina Highway Patrol Officers
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Adam Roy Rollins
Defendant:
State of North Carolina Highway Patrol Officers, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randolph v. USA
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
Adam Lawrence Randolph, IV
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
