Cases 11 - 20 of 1,210
ADAMS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
KORVETTE ADAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Myers v. Adams
as 6:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alonzo Myers
Defendant:
Warden Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Gandhi v. Braywood et al
as 1:2024cv02183
Plaintiff:
Reema Gandhi
Defendant:
Adam L. Braywood and United Road Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Willey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Segundo Adams
Defendant:
James O. Willey, F. L. Moore & Sons, Inc. and National Interstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR
Defendant:
Warden JACOB BEASLEY, Warden SHAWN EMMONS, Warden BRIAN ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radu v. Rawley
as 1:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Marian Radu
Defendant:
Adam Rawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
