Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Ronald Van Hook v. State of Idaho, et al
as 23-35457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD VAN HOOK
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, BEAVER, Magistrate Judge; Judge, MCKEE, District Court Judge;Judge and others
Williams v. Curran et al
as 3:2023cv03221
Plaintiff:
Shane Williams
Defendant:
Brian Curran, Heather Lindell, City of Quincy Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Hook v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Judge Beaver, Judge McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepley v. Adams County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2021cv01558
Defendant:
St. Lukes Presbyterian and Adams County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Vanessa D. Shepley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brenda Jones v. Brent York, et al
as 21-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAMS COUNTY, BRENT YORK, Adams County Sheriff and AS-OF-YET UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Gonzales v. Adams County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2021cv00788
Defendant:
Brandon Neel and Adams County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ditirro v. Sando et al
as 1:2020cv03412
Defendant:
Matthew Sando, Commerce City Police Department, Brighton Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Damon Ditirro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Adams County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2020cv03031
Defendant:
Curtis Garth, Adams County Sheriff's Department and Neel
Plaintiff:
Anthony R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De Gomez v. Adams County et al
as 1:2020cv01824
Defendant:
Wellpath, John Jane Doe, Cory A Wills and others
Plaintiff:
Celia Gonzalez de Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hovey v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2020cv00976
Defendant:
Chad Jenkins and Adams County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Twilight Hovey and Twilight (I) Hovey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
